Prevalence of Pes Planus and Its Associated Factors Among Primary School Pupils Aged 8-12 Years in Southeast Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34058/njmr.v19i1.164Keywords:
Keywords, Staheli index, BMI, pes planus, footwears, pupilsAbstract
ABSTRACT
Background: Footprints of hominoids already demonstrated the existence of a plantar arch 3.7 million years ago, and, during human evolution, feet and not hands experienced extraordinary changes. The arch index is useful in determining the prevalence of pes planus and possibly predicting pathologic foot conditions, and it may serve as warning signs of structural and functional defects of the foot in a given population.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the plantar arch index using the staheli`s evaluation method and determined the point prevalence of pes planus and its association with sex difference, BMI, type of footwear and using footwear early in life.
Method: This ex-post facto study involved 352 (150 males and 202 females) apparently health primary school pupils aged 8-12 years in southeast Nigeria who volunteered to participate in the study. The participants` biodata were obtained and their footprints collected with the ink method. Footprints were traced and selected foot dimensions measured on the footprints. Plantar arch index of each foot was calculated using the staheli`s formula; PI=A/B, where PI= plantar arch index, A= central region of the footprint and B= heel region of the footprint. Data collected were summarized and analysed with descriptive statistics of mean, standard deviation, percentage, chi-square and independent t-test, alpha level was set at 0.05
Results: Mean age of participants was 10.28±1.26 while the mean body mass index was 17.60±2.81.The findings of this study revealed a low prevalence of pes planus (7.1%) in the population under study with males having slightly higher prevalence (4.3%) than females (2.8%). This study also found no significant association between sex difference and pes planus (p= 0.114), no significant association between type of footwear and pes planus (p= 0.314), but it found a significant association between BMI and pes planus (p= 0.039).
The study also reveal that type of first footwear, type of frequent footwear, type of school footwear, type of home footwear and early footwear were not significantly associated with occurrence pes planus p=0.205, p=0.170, p=0.819, p=0.062 and p= 0.714 .
Conclusion: The findings of this research shows that the prevalence of pes planus in the age group studied is not high and not of any health concern.
 Keywords: Staheli index, BMI, pes planus, footwears, pupils
References
REFERENCES
Abolarin T, Aiyegbusi A, Tella A, 2011. Predictive factors for flatfoot: The role of age and footwear in children in urban and rural communities in South West Nigeria. Foot (Edinburgh); 21(4):188–92.
Bordin, D., Girrogi, G.D., Mazacco, G., and Rigon, F, 2001. Flat and cavus foot, indexes of obesity and overweight in a population of primary school children. Minerva Pediatrica.; 53: 7–13
Canale S.T, (2003). Pes planus. In: Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 10th Ed. St Louis Mosby, 4017-4042.
Cappello TMD, Song KMMD, 1998. Determining treatment of flatfeet in children. Current Opinion in Paediatrics; 10(1):77–81.
Cavangah P.R. and Rodgers M.M, 1987. The arch index: A useful measure from footprint. Journal of Biomechanics; 20: 547-51.
Chang J.H, Wang S.H, Kuo C.L, 2010. Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender, and age. European Journal of Pediatrics.; 169(4):447–52.
Chen K.C, Yeh C.J, Kuo J.F, 2011. Footprint analysis of flatfoot in preschool-aged children. European Journal of Pediatrics;170(5):611–7.
Christensen K. D, 1984. Clinical chiropractic biomechanics, Dubuque: foot levellers educational division.
Dahle L.K, Mueller M, Delitto A, Diamond J.E, 1991. Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to lower extremity injury. Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy; 14:70-74.
Dowling, A.M., Steele, J.R., and Baur, L.A, 2001. Does obesity influence foot structure and plantar pressure patterns in prepubescent children? International Journal of Obesity; 25: 845–852
Echarri, J.J. and Forriol, F, 2003. The development in footprint morphology in 1851 Congolese children from urban and rural areas, and the relationship between this and wearing shoes. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics; 12: 141–146
Eluwa, M.A., R.B. Omini, T. Kpela, T.B. Ekanem and A.O. Akpantah, 2009. The incidence of pes planus amongst akwa ibom state students in the University of Calabar. International Journal of Forensic Science; 3: 2-2
Engel G.M and Staheli L.T, 1974. The natural history of torsion and other factors influencing gait in childhood. Journal of clinical orthopaedics. Related Research. 99: 12-17.
Edwin J. Harris, John V. Vanore, James L. Thomas, Steven R. Kravitz, Stephen A. Mendelson, Robert W. Mendicino, Stephen H. Silvani and Susan C. Gassen, 2004. Diagnosis and treatment of paediatric flat foot, journal of foot and ankle surgery, vol 43.
Evans A.M, Rome K.A, 2011. Cochrane review of the evidence for non-surgical interventions for flexible pediatric flat feet. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine; 47(1):69–89.
Ezema C.I, Abaraogu U.O, Okafor G.O, 2013. Flat foot and associated factors among primary school children: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Physiotherapy.
Farfan H.F, 1975. Muscular mechanisms of the lumbar spine and the position of power and efficiency. Orthopaedic clinic of North America; 6(1): 135-144.
Flat Feet in Adults and Children: causes, symptoms & treatments,2013. www.footankleinstitute.com Accessed on 24.03.015.
Giladi M, Milgrom C, Stein M, 1985. The low arch, a protective factor in stress fractures. Orthopaedic Review.; 14:709-712.
Gray.H, 1918. Arches of the Foot". Anatomy of the Human Body. Bartleby.com. ISBN 0-8121-0644-X
Greenstein G.M, 1997. Clinical assessment of neuromuscular disorders, St Louis, mosby. 4:56-60.
Gross M.L, Darling L.B and Evanski P.L, 1991. Effectiveness of orthotic shoe inserts in the log distant runner. American journal of sports medicine; 19(4): 409-412.
Harris E.J, Vanore J.V, Thomas J.L, 2004. Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric flatfoot. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery; 43(6):341–73.
Hames,M.R, Nachbeuer W, Sovak D, 1992. Footprint parameters as a measure of arch height. Foot Ankle: Jan; 13(1):22-6 10.
Henry Gray, 1984. Gray`s anatomy. Public domain edition.19. 23: 1102-1120.
Hernandez A.J, Kmura L.K, Laraya M.H.F, and Favaro E. (2007). Calculation of staheli’s plantar arch index and prevalence of flat foot: a study with 100 children aged 5-9 years. Acta Orthopica. 15 (2).
Hogan M.T, Staheli L.T, (2002). Arch height and lower limb pain, an adult civilian study. Foot and Ankle International. 23: 43-47
Hunt A.E, Smith R.M, 2004. Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking. Clinical biomechanics: 19(4):391–7.
Huson A, 1987. Joints and movements of the foot: terminology and concepts. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand; 25:117–130.
Kanati U, Yetkin H, Cilia E, 2001. Footprint and radiological analysis of feet. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics; 21(2): 225-8. 11.
Kwon J.Y, Myerson M.S, 2010. Management of the flexible flat foot in the child: a focus on the use of osteotomies for correction. Foot and Ankle Clinic; 15(2):309–22.
Magee D.J. 1987. Orthopaedic physical assessment. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders.
Malicky E.S, 2002. Talocalcaneal and subfibular impingement in symptomatic flatfoot in adults. Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 84: 2005–9.
Marieb/Hoehn, 1980. Human Anatomy & Physiology, 9th edition. 5: 345-8.
McCormack A.P, 1998. Two reconstructive techniques for flatfoot deformity comparing contact characteristics of the hindfoot joints. Foot and ankle international, 19(7):452–6.
Meehan P., 1990. Other Conditions of the Foot. In: Morrissy RT, ed. Lovell and Winter’s pediatric orthopaedics, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott: 991–1022.
Mickle K.J, Steele J.R, Munro B.J, 2006. The feet of overweight and obese young children: are they flat or fat? Obesity (Silver Spring); 14(11):1949–53.
Moraleda L, Mubarak S.J. Flexible flatfoot: differences in the relative alignment of each segment of the foot between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedic; 31(4):421–8.
Morris J: Biomechanics of the foot and ankle. Clinical Orthopaedics 122:10, 1977.
Mortazavi S.M.J, Espandar R, Baghdadi T, 2007. Flatfoot in children: How to approach? Iran Journal of Pediatrics; 17(2):163–70.
Mueller M, Maluf K: Tissue adaptation to physical stress: A proposed ′′physical stress theory′′ to guide physical therapist practice, education, and research. Physical Therapy 2:383–403, 2002.
Ndupu K.I, 2008. Research Methodology: Sample Size in Self Teaching Project. God`s Favour Graphics, Enugu: 89-90
Omey M, and Micheli L.J, (1999). Foot and ankle problems in the young athletes. Foot and Ankle International;31: (7): 470-486
Pes planus (flat foot) 2015, www.twinborophysicaltherapy.com,. Accessed on 15.03.015.
Platzer, Werner (2004). Color Atlas of Human Anatomy, Vol. 1: Locomotor System (5th ed.). Thieme. ISBN 3-13-533305-1.
Rao U.B, Joseph B, 1992. The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot. A survey of 2300 children. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Br; 74(4):525–7.
Riccio I, Gimigliano F, Gimigliano R, Porpora G, Iolascon G. 2009. Rehabilitative treatment in flexible flatfoot: a perspective cohort study. La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento 93(3), 101-107.
Rockar P.A. Jr, 1995. The subtalar joint: anatomy and joint motion. Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy; 21:361–372.
Rodriguez N, Choung D.J, Dobbs M.B, 2010. Rigid pediatric pes planovalgus: conservative and surgical treatment options. Clincs in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery; 27(1):79–92.
Schafer R.C, 1983. Clinical biomechanics: musculoskeletal actions and reactions, Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
Shih Y.F, Chen C.Y, Chen W.Y, 2012. Lower extremity kinematics in children with and without flexible flatfoot: a comparative study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders; 13:31.
Sinkin A and Leichter I, (1990). Role of the calcaneal inclination in the energy capacity of the human foot-a biochemical model. Medical and Boilogical Engineering and Commputing. 28:149-152
Sinkjaer T, Toft E, Andreassen S, Hornemann B.C, 1988. Muscle stiffness in human ankle dorsiflexors: intrinsic and reflex components. Journal of Neurophysiology; 60:1110–1121.
Sobel, E., Levitz, S., Caselli, M., Brentnall, Z., and Tran, M, 1999 . Natural history of the rearfoot angle: preliminary values in 150 children. Foot and Ankle International; 20: 119–125
Somers D.L, Hanson J.A, Kedzierski C.M, 1997. The influence of experience on the reliability of goniometric and visual measurement of forefoot position. Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy; 25:192-202.
Staheli L, Chew D, Corbett M, 1987. The longitudinal arch: a survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. Journal of bone and joint surgery, 69A:426–8.
Staheli L, 1999. Planovalgus foot deformity. Current status. Journal of American Podiatrics Medical Association; 89(2):94–9.
Steindler A, 1977. Kinesiology of the human body under normal and pathological conditions. 3rd Ed, Springfield: Charles C. Thomas. The foot vol II, Los Angeles: clinical biomechanics Corp.
Subotnick S.I, 1975. Biomechanics of subtalar and mid tarsal joints. Journal of American Podiatry association; 65: 756-764.
Urray S.R, Wearing S.C, 2001. A comparison of footprint indices calculated from ink and electronic footprint. Journal of American Podiatric Medical Association; 91(4): 203-9 12.
Umar M.B.T and Adeyemi P, 2010. Incidence of Flat Foot and Anthropometric Comparison Between Flat and Normal Foot of the Yoruba Ehtnic Group of Nigeria. Research Journal of Applied Sciences; 5(6): 412-416.
Volpon J.B, 1994. Foot print analysis during the growth period. Journal of paediatric Orthopaedics. 4:83-5
Walczak M, Napiontek M, 2003. Stopa plaska statyczna dziecieca, kontrowersyjnytemat. [Flexible flat foot in children, a controversial subject.] Chirurgia narzadow ruchu i ortopedia polska, 68(4): 261–7.
