The Responsiveness of the Emory Functional Ambulation Profile in Rehabilitation of Ambulant Stroke Survivors

  • Christopher Olusanjo Akosile 1Department of Medical Rehabilitation, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Anambra State
  • V C Igbanugo
  • Babatunde O Adegoke
Keywords: St roke, Physical Therapy, Responsiveness, Functional ambulation

Abstract

Background: The Emory Functional Ambulation Profile (EFAP) was designed to measure functional ambulation in post-stroke survivors. Its' ability to detect the effectiveness of any physical therapy protocol has been sparsely investigated.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the ability of the EFAP to detecting patients' response to a physical therapy protocol in stroke rehabilitation.

Methods: The pretest-posttest experimental design was used for this study. Seventeen consecutive stroke survivors who met the inclusion criteria were recruited into the study. Participants received a conservative physical therapy protocol twice weekly for 8 weeks. Performance on individual subtasks of the EFAP were measured and recorded for each participant before and at the end of the study. Data was available at the posttest for only 14 participants (mean age = 57.00 9.05 years; average poststroke period = 19.71 26.56 months) and this was analyzed using frequency and percentages with inferential statistics of paired t-test at .05 alpha level.

Results: Participants scores for all the EFAP subtasks and overall scores improved (reduced task completion time) at the end of the treatment programme. Responsiveness for the EFAP ranged from 3% to 21% for all subtasks. Changes were even significant for three [floor carpet, up and go] out of the 5 subtasks and the total EFAP scores (p<.05)

Conclusion: EFAP was able to detect the response of stroke survivors to the physical therapy protocol used in this study and is therefore recommended for use by clinicians and researchers for measuring treatment outcome.

References

? Bohannon RW (1987). Gait performance of hemiparetic stroke patients: selected variables. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 68:777-781.

? Brown LA, McKenzie NL and Doan JB (2005). Age dependent differences in the attentional demands of obstacle negotiation. Journal of Geriatric Science and Medical Sciences 60(7):924-927.

? Cohen JJ, Sween JD, Walker JM and Smith KB (1987). Establishing criteria for community ambulation. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 1987. 3:71-77.

? Cromwell R and Wellmon R (2001). Sagital plane head stabilization during level walking and ambulation on stairs. Physio Research International 6 (3):1799-192.

? David DL, Brown DA, Pierson-Carey CD, Buckley EL and Lew HL (2004). Stepping over obstacles to improve walking in individuals with poststroke hemiplegia. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 41(3A):283-292.

? Eisenberg MG (1995). Dictionary of Rehabilitation. New

York. Springer Publishing Company. PP 103.

? Embrey DG, Holtz SL, Alon G, Brandsma BA, McCoy SW (2010) Functional electrical stimulation to dorsiflexors and plantarflexors to improve gait during walking in adults with chronic hemiplegia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 91(5): 687-696.

? French S (1998) How significant is statistical significance? A critique of the use of statistics in research. Physiotherapy. 74: 266-268

? Geiger RA, Allen JB, O'Keefe J and Hicks RR (2001). Balance and mobility following stroke: effects of physical therapy interventions with and without biofeedback/ forceplate training. Physical Therapy 81:995-1005.

? Guimares RM and Isaacs B (1980). Incidence and consequences of falls due to stroke: a systematic inquiry. International Rehabilitation Medicine. 2: 177-80.

? Kwakkel G and Wagenaar RC (2002). Effect of duration of upper- and lower- extremity rehabilitation on sessions and walking speed on recovery of interlimb coordination in hemiplegic gait. Physical Therapy. 82: 432-448.

? Mathias S, Nayak USL and Isaac B (1996). Balance in elderly patients: the get up and go test. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 67:387-389.

? Means KM (1996). The obstacle course: a tool for the assessment of functional balance and mobility in the elderly. Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 33:413-429.

? Nadeau S, McFadyen BJ and Malouin F (2003). Frontal and sagital plane analysis of the stairs climbing task in healthy adults aged over 40 years: what are the challenges compared to level walking? Clinical Biomechanics. 18(10):950-959.

? Nelson AJ (1974). Functional ambulation profile. Physical Therapy. 54:1059-1065.

? Perry J, Garret M, Gronely JK and Mulroy SJ (1995). Classification of walking handicap in stroke population. Stroke. 26:982-989.

? Robinett CS and Vondran MA (1988). Functional ambulation velocity and distance requirements in rural and urban communities: a clinical report. Physical Therapy. 61:351-353.

? Robinson JL and Smidt GL (1981). Quantitative gait evaluation in the clinic. Physical Therapy. 61: 351-353

? Roth EJ, Merbitz C, Mroczek K, Dugan SA and Suh WW (1997). Hemiplegic gait relationship between walking speed and other temporal parameter. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 76(2): 128-133.

? Said CM, Goldie PA, Patla AE, Sparrow WA and Martin KE (1999). Obstacle crossing in subjects with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 80(9):1054-1059.

? Shumway-Cook A, Baldwin M, Polissar NL and Gruber W (1997). Predicting the probability of falls in community- dwelling older adults. Physical Therapy. 77:812-819

? Thorbahn LD and Newton RA (1996). Use of the Berg Balance Test to predict falls in elderly persons. Physical Therapy. 76: 576-585.

? Tinetti ME and Ginter SF (1988). Identifying mobility dysfunctions in elderly patients, standard neuromuscular examination or direct assessment? Journal of the American Medical Association. 259:1190-1193.

? Troy KL and Grabiner MO (2005). The presence of an obstacle influences the stepping response during induced trips and surrogate tasks. Experimental Brain Research. 161:343-350.

? Turnbull GI and Wall IC (1985). The development of a system for the clinical assessment of gait following a stroke. Physiotherapy. 71(7): 294-298.

? Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Gage K, Gurucharri, K, Robertson R and Stephen K (1999). Establishing the reliability and validity of measurement of walking time using the Emory functional ambulation profile. Physical Therapy. 79:1122-1133.

? Wolf SL. (1979) A method for quantifying ambulatory activities. Physical Therapy. 59:767-768.

? Wolfson L, Whipple R, Amerman P and Tobin JN (1990).

Gait assessment in the elderly: a gait abnormality rating scale and its relation to falls. Journal of Gerontology. 45:M12-M19.

Published
2012-12-20
How to Cite
Akosile, C. O., Igbanugo, V. C., & Adegoke, B. O. (2012). The Responsiveness of the Emory Functional Ambulation Profile in Rehabilitation of Ambulant Stroke Survivors. Nigerian Journal of Medical Rehabilitation, 15(1.2), 33-37. https://doi.org/10.34058/njmr.v15i1.2.56
Section
Research Articles