Relevance of Location to Outcome of Stroke Rehabilitation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34058/njmr.v16i1.69Keywords:
Stroke, Rehabilitation, Care environmentAbstract
Rehabilitation after stroke is a process that plays an important role in improving and / or enhancing recovery beyond what would have occurred spontaneously. The choice of environment for provision of rehabilitation services, mode of organisation and delivery of services are pertinent to the outcome of rehabilitation. Yet limited information exists on the best way to organise stroke rehabilitation and the relative cost of such services. The involvement and empowerment of patients are inherent and integral to the rehabilitation process. Health policy should therefore be directed at the adoption of rehabilitation settings that stimulate the involvement of patients in their own rehabilitation process and at an affordable cost.
References
Boyce W., Koros M., Hodgson J. 2002. Community based rehabilitation: a strategy for peace-building. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 2,6.
Claesson L, Hedström-Gosman G, Johannesson M, Fagerberg B, Blomstrand C. 2000.Resource Utilization and Costs of Stroke Unit Integrated In a Care Continuum: A 1-year Controlled, Prospective, Randomized Study In Elderly Patients. The The Göteborg 70+ Stroke Study. Stroke, 31, 2569-2577.
Forster A., Young J. 2011. Community rehabilitation for older people: Day hospital or home-based services? Age and Ageing, 40(1), 2-4
Holmqvist L.W., vonKoch L. 2001. Environmental factors in stroke rehabilitation. being in hospital itself demotivates patients. British Medical Journal, 322, 1501-1502.
Indredavik B., Fjaertoft H., Ekeberg G., Loge A.D., Morch B. 2000. Benefit of an extended stroke unit service with early supported discharge: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 31(12), 2989-2994.
Kollen B., Kwakkel G., Linderman E. 2006. Functional recovery after stroke: a review of current developments in stroke rehabilitation research. Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials, 1, 75-80.
Mackey F., Ada L., Heard R., Adams R. 1996. Stroke Rehabilitation: Are Highly Structured Units more Conducive to Physical Activity than less Structured units? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(10), 1066-1070.
Strong K., Mathers C., Bonita R. 2007. Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world. Lancet Neurology, 6(2), 182-187.
Teasell R., Meyer M.J., McClure A., Pan C., Murie-Fernadez M., Foley N., Salter K. 2009. Stroke Rehabilitation: An International Perspective. Top Stroke Rehabilitation, 16(1), 44-56
Winstein C., Miller J., Blanton S., Morris D., Uswatte G., Taul E., Nichols D., Wolf S. 2003. Methods for a multi-site randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint- induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 17,137-152
Young J., Donaldson K. 2001. Community hospitals and older people. Age and Ageing, 30(suppl 3), 7-10.
